TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (12) TMI 30
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e appellant's case. 3. The learned CIT[A] ought not to have upheld the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s. 80P[2][a][i] of the Act to the extent of Rs. 26,34,597/- being the interest income earned from deposits made in Co-operative Banks having regard to the judgment of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of TUMKUR MERCHANTS SOUHARDA CREDIT. COOPERATIVE LTD reported in [2015] 230 Taxman 309 [Kar] purportedly in light of the later judgement of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Pr.CIT, Hubballi v. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society [2017] 83 taxmann.com 140 [Karnataka]. 4. The learned CIT[A] ought to have appreciated that the appellant had earned the interest income from investments statutorily required to be maintained under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act from out of the profits besides 25% of the total deposits as SLR with co-operative banks and 3% of the total deposits towards CRR and thus, the income earned therefrom ought to have been assessed as part of the business of the providing credit facilities to its members and therefore, entitled to deduction u/s. 80P[2][a][i] of the Act, under the facts and in the circumstances o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of section 80P(4) of the I.T.Act. As regards the interest income of Rs.26,34,597 received by the assessee and assessed as income from other sources, the CIT(A) confirmed the view taken by the A.O. 5. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed the present appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed a paper book comprising of 94 pages, inter alia, enclosing therein the copy of bye-laws of the assessee-society, acknowledgement for having filed the return of income with the computation of income, receipts and payments account, notices issued by the A.O., the replies submitted by the assessee, detailed break-up of the interest received from co-operative society and co-operative bank etc. The learned AR apart from relying on the grounds, submitted that the assessee ought to be allowed expenditure u/s 57 of the I.T.Act for earning the interest income, which was assessed as "income from other sources". In this context, the learned AR relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO reported in [2015] 58 Taxmann.com 35 (Karnataka) (judgment dated 25.03.2015). 6. The learned Departmental ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs. The interest income so derived or the capital, if not immediately required to be lent to the members, they cannot keep the said amount idle. If they deposit this amount in bank so as to earn interest, the said interest income is attributable to the profits and gains of the business of providing credit facilities to its members only. The society is not carrying on any separate business for earning such interest income. The income so derived is the amount of profits and gains of business attributable to the activity of carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members by a co-operative society and is liable to be deducted from the gross total income under Section 80P of the Act. The Hon'ble Court also distinguished the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Totgars (supra) by observing that the Supreme Court was dealing with a case where the assessee- Cooperative Society, apart from providing credit facilities to the members, was also in the business of marketing of agricultural produce grown by its members. The sale consideration received from marketing agricultural produce of its members was retained in many cases. The said retained....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l with the following substantial question of law: "(I)Whether the assessee, Totagar Co-operative Sale Society, Sirsi, is entitled to 100% deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') in respect of whole of its income by way of interest earned by it during the relevant Assessment Years from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 on the deposits or investments made by it during these years with a Co-operative Bank, M/s. Kanara District Central Co-operative Bank Limited? (II) Whether the Supreme Court decision in the case of the present respondent assessee, Totgar Co-operative Sale Society Limited itself rendered on 08th February 2010, in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Limited v. Income Tax Officer, reported in (2010) 322 ITR 283 SC : (2010) 3 SCC 223 for the preceding years, namely Assessment Years 1991-1992 to 1999-2000 (except Assessment Year 1995- 1996) holding that such interest income earned by the assessee was taxable under the head 'Income from Other Sources' under Section 56 of the Act and was not 100% deductible from the Gross Total Income under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, is not applicable to the present Assessment Yea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t to deny the claim of the respondent assessee for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The only exception is that of a primary agricultural credit society. (Paragraph-14 of the judgment) 3. The amendment of Section 194A(3)(v) of the Act excluding the Co-operative Banks from the definition of "Cooperative Society" by Finance Act, 2015 and requiring them to deduct income tax at source under Section 194A of the Act also makes the legislative intent clear that the Cooperative Banks are not that specie of genus co-operative society, which would be entitled to exemption or deduction under the special provisions of Chapter VIA in the form of Section 80P of the Act. (Paragarph 15 of the Judgment) 4. If the legislative intent is so clear, then it cannot contended that the omission to amend Clause (d) of Section 80P(2) of the Act at the same time is fatal to the contention raised by the Revenue before this Court and sub silentio, the deduction should continue in respect of interest income earned from the co-operative bank, even though the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in the case of Respondent assessee itself is otherwise.(Paragraph 16 of the Judgment) 5. On the de....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t High Court held that in the case of Totgars Co-operative Sale Society (supra) decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court, the court was dealing with two kinds of activities: interest income earned from the amount retained from the amount payable to the members from whom produce was bought and which was invested in short-term deposits/securities; and the interest derived from the surplus funds that the assessee therein invested in short-term deposits with the Government securities. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in this regard referred to the decision of the Karnataka High Court from which the matter travelled to the Supreme Court wherein it was the case of the assessee that it was carrying on the business of providing credit facilities to its members and therefore, the appellant-society being an assessee engaged in providing credit facilities to its members, the interest received on deposits in business and securities is attributable to the business of the assessee as its job is to provide credit facilities to its members and marketing the agricultural products of its members. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court therefore held that decision in the case of Totagar Co-operative Sales Society rend....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....On this argument, the learned DR pointed out that the jurisdiction u/s.263 of the Act was exercised by the CIT not for the reason that the AO failed to make proper enquiries before concluding the Assessment but on the ground that his decision was contrary to decision of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court and therefore this argument of the learned counsel for the Assessee cannot be accepted. The argument that the view taken by the AO was a possible view and hence revision u/s.263 of the Act is bad is again not acceptable because, the view that ought to have been adopted was the later binding decision of the High Court in the case of Totagar co-opeartive sales society 395 ITR 611 (Karn.). 16. The argument that co-operative Banks are also co-operative societies is again without any basis in the light of the law explained in the case of Totagar co-opeartive sales society 395 ITR 611 (Karn.). The reliance placed by the learned counsel for the Assessee on the earlier decisions of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. (supra) that the decision in Totgars Co-operative Sale Society (supra) stands explained by the later decision in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to the members. This aspect requires examination by the AO as it has not been raised before the CIT. We therefore modify the order of the CIT by remanding the issue raised in ground No.5 to 7 alone to the AO for examination afresh. In other respects we confirm the order of the CIT." 7.1 In the instant case, it was contended that majority of the interest income is earned out of investments made with Cooperative Banks and is in compliance with the requirement under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act and Rules. If the amounts are invested in compliance with the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, necessarily, the same is to be assessed as income from business, which entails the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act. Insofar as deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the I.T.Act is concerned, we make it clear that interest income received out of investments with cooperative societies is to be allowed as deduction. 7.2 Insofar as assessee's claim that if interest income is to be assessed income from other sources, necessarily, the cost incurred for earning such interest income should be allowed as deduction u/s 57 of the I.T.Act, we find an identical issue was considered by ....