Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (5) TMI 1481

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Act, 1961 (in brevity "the Act") for the Assessment Year 2016 - 2017. The instant appeal was generated by the order of the learned Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward - 22(2), Tambaram by order No. ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2018-19/1014509508(1), Order dated 22.12.2018 passed u/s.143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that the appeal of the Revenue is time barred by 175 days. However, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act along with the Affidavit was filed by the Income Tax Officer mentioning the reason for delay in filing the appeal before the Hon'ble Tribunal. The delay was due to 'Covid-19' pandemic. The learned ITO requested the Hon'ble Bench to take into cognizance the Order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court the "Suo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... entire deduction was disallowed and added back with the total income of the Assessee. Aggrieved, the Assessee filed an appeal before the learned CIT(A). The learned CIT(A) allowed two issues, i.e. one related to the deduction u/s.80P(2) and the other related to video / still photography charges. Being aggrieved, the Revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal. 5. During the hearing, the learned DR vehemently argued and mentioned that the learned CIT(A) did not adjudicate the issues in a proper manner. He prayed that the bank interest earned by the Assessee is liable to be taxed under the head "income from other sources". The learned DR further mentioned that the video / still photography charge is not a collective labour. So, this would c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....usiness as decided by the Apex Court in the case of Cambay Electric Supply Company Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [113 ITR 84]. (v) As regards, the video / still camera charges and interest income, the applicability of the same is discussed in the earlier paras. As decided by the CIT-VII, Chennai in order u/s.264 of the Income Tax Act in the case of M/s. Tamil Nadu Handloom Weavers Co-operative Society for the Assessment Year 2010-2011, it is held that the deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(vi) is also eligible for video / still camera charges and interest income for the case under consideration." 6.1. He further pointed out that the issue related to the interest from the co-operative banks has already been decided in different judicial for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....banks are first cooperative society and thereafter they are converted into banks. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court is also in favour of the Assessee. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut [2021] 123 Taxmann.com 161 (SC) observed that whether the Assessee is registered as a primary agricultural credit society, it is entitled for the benefit of deduction u/s.80P(2) of the Act, notwithstanding that it was also giving loans to its members which is not related to agriculture. Respectfully considering the judicial observations, it is clear that, in the case of the interest earned from the co-operative bank, it does not come under the consideration of the income....