Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (1) TMI 1297

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Appellant : Mr. P. K. Bhomick, Adv., Mr. M. N. Bandopadhyay, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. S. M. Surana, Adv., Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv. ORDER The Court : This appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act for brevity) is directed against the order dated 16th January, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "C" Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....per provision to explanation 2 to Section 263 of the Act? We have heard Mr. P. K. Bhowmick, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. S. M. Surana, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee. The contention of the revenue before us is that the Tribunal failed to appreciate that the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had directed the Joint Commiss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts out that the appellant department has not controverted the contents of the letter of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax dated 18th August, 2016 and has recorded that the said letter clearly brings out that the PCIT has called for proposal from the JCIT/Assessing Officer to exercise jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the PCIT has not exercised jur....