AI Drafter 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (11) TMI 1126
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he learned AO disallowed late payment of employees provident fund and employees State insurance scheme of Rs.357,500. 02. Assessee raised following grounds of appeal: - "1 The Honorable CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of the learned Assessing Officer disallowing employer's contribution to Provident Fund of Rs. 3,57,500 though claimed u/s 43B as the same was paid before due date of filing of return of Income Tax. 2. The Honorable CIT(A) erred in passing the order against principles of natural justice as no opportunity of proper hearing was given to the appellant neither by the Honorable CIT(A) nor by the learned assessing officer. 3. The Honorable CIT(A) erred in not allowing the employer's contribu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he employees" in section 43B (b) cover only employers' contributions to these funds to be borne and paid by employer out of his income, and not employees' contributions to these funds deducted by employer out of employees' income/salary. The former are sums which are liabilities of the employer to be borne by him out of his own income. The latter are sums deducted from others' income and held in trust by him and deemed to be his income under section 2(24)(x) unless deposited with concerned authorities on or before the due date as defined in Explanation (now Explanation 1) below section 36(1)(va) i.e. due dates under the relevant employee welfare legislation like PF Act, ESI Act etc. iv. The non-obstante clause in se....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....class of receipt, i.e., amounts received (or deducted from the employees) were to be part of the employer/assessee's income. Since these amounts were not receipts that belonged to the assessee, but were held by it, as trustees, as it were, Section 36(1)(va) was inserted specifically to ensure that if these receipts were deposited in the EPF/ESI accounts of the employees concerned, they could be treated as deductions. Section 36(1)(va) was hedged with the condition that the amounts/receipts had to be deposited by the employer, with the EPF/ESI, on or before the due date. The last expression "due date" was dealt with in the explanation as the date by which such amounts had to be credited by the employer, in the concerned enactments such a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tween the two. ix. There is no doubt that in Alom Extrusions, this court did consider the impact of deletion of second proviso to Section 43B, which mandated that unless the amount of employers' contribution was deposited with the authorities, the deduction otherwise permissible in law, would not be available. This court was of the opinion that the omission was curative, and that as long as the employer deposited the dues, before filing the return of income tax, the deduction was available. A reading of the judgment in Alom Extrusions, would reveal that this court, did not consider Sections 2(24)(x) and 36(1)(va). Furthermore, the separate provisions in Section 36(1) for employers' contribution and employees' contributi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....yer. The significance of this provision is that on the one hand it brought into the fold of "income" amounts that were receipts or deductions from employees income; at the time, payment within the prescribed time - by way of contribution of the employees' share to their credit with the relevant fund is to be treated as deduction (Section 36(1)(va)). The other important feature is that this distinction between the employers' contribution (Section 36(1)(iv)) and employees' contribution required to be deposited by the employer (Section 36(1)(va)) was maintained - and continues to be maintained. On the other hand, Section 43B covers all deductions that are permissible as expenditures, or out-goings forming part of the assessees'....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g the obligation of every assessee under Section 43B. xii. The non-obstante clause in section 43B would not in any manner dilute or override the employer's obligation under section 36(1)(va) to deposit the amounts retained by it or deducted by it from the employee's income, unless the condition that it is deposited on or before the due date, is correct and justified. The non-obstante clause has to be understood in the context of the entire provision of Section 43B which is to ensure timely payment before the returns are filed, of certain liabilities which are to be borne by the assessee in the form of tax, interest payment and other statutory liability. In the case of these liabilities, what constitutes the due date is defi....