Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (11) TMI 936

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NDENT ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr.Dhaval Vyas waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.4. 2. By this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has mainly prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 9.2.2018 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the delay of 178 days occurred in filing the appeal before the Tribunal is explained in paras 3 and 4 of the application to condone the delay. It was pointed out that the clerk of the appellant left the petitioner - Company before two-three years before the date when the matter was taken up by Commissioner (Appeals) for further hearing in the third round of litigation. It was pointed out that a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issue in the appeal filed by the petitioner before the CESTAT pertains to the classification and therefore even the appeal is not maintainable before the CESTAT. It was therefore submitted that the remedy availed by the petitioner by invoking this extraordinary jurisdiction of this court by preferring this petition should not be entertained. 5. We have considered the submissions made by learned a....