Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (11) TMI 736

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ile of Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad. 2. The 1st petitioner filed original return of income tax in the assessment year 2014-15 on 29.11.2014 declaring a total income of Rs.1,03,44,060/-. After claiming a tax credit for TDS of Rs.53,016/, out of the admitted tax liability, as per the return of income, the accused filed return of Rs.38,00,170/-. However, the tax was not paid. 3. It is the case of the respondent that the accused has willfully defaulted in payment of self assessment tax of admitted income as required under Section 140A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 attracting the provisions under Section 276C(2) of the Act, which penalizes such default. 4. The Income Tax Department issued a show-cause notice dated 09.06.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the aforesaid judgment, the accused was prosecuted on the ground that though returns were filed, he failed to pay the said tax amount. The Court found that the act of filing returns by itself cannot be construed as an attempt to evade tax rather it would suggest that there was a voluntary declaration to pay the tax. 8. In the case of Prem Dass v. Income Tax Officer [(1999) 5 Supreme Court Cases 241], the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a positive act on the part of the accused is required to establish a charge under Section 276-C(2). 9. Learned Senior Counsel also relied upon the judgment of this Court in Criminal Petition No.3164 of 2008, dated September, 2015, which was decided on similar lines. 10. The Learned Standing Counsel ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on of this Act, be punishable,- (i) in a case where the amount sought to be evaded exceeds one hundred thousand rupees, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to seven years and with fine; (ii) in any other case, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to three years and with fine. (2) If a person wilfully attempts in any manner whatsoever to evade the payment of any tax, penalty or interest under this Act, he shall, without prejudice to any penalty that may be imposable on him under any other provision of this Act, be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ealment on any factual aspects and tried to evade tax, which is liable to paid. There is no dispute regarding the claims made by the petitioners in their income tax returns. 15. Having received the notice, the petitioners have paid additional amount of Rs.12,55,140/- towards interest and other charges, apart from the assessed tax. It was stated that due to financial difficulties beyond control, the amount could not be paid in time. 16. As already discussed, this is not a case wherein false declaration is made or that the department has found that there is a deliberate attempt to evade tax by suppressing material information. Whether there is willful delay or not are discernible from the facts of the case. 17. The conduct of the pet....