2022 (11) TMI 645
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....i Kapoor and Mr Vishal Kumar, Advocates. Respondents Through: Mr R. Ramachandran, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2. Ms Archana Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.3. O R D E R [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 42524/2022 1. Allowed, subject to the petitioner filling legible copies of the annexures, at least three days before the next date of h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....amachandran, who appears on behalf of the contesting respondents i.e., respondents no.1 and 2, has placed before us a hard copy of a circular dated 26.05.2003. 4.1. Based on this circular, Mr Ramachandran submits that respondents place matters in a "call book"- inter alia, if the issue which arises for consideration in a case is also subject matter of an action pending adjudication in a superio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rt of the callbook. 6. That said, concededly, the judgment in Shobha Developers Ltd. Was rendered by the Supreme Court in January 2017. 6.1 Clearly, at no point in time, the petitioner i.e., the noticee, was informed that such a procedure was being followed. 6.2. Although, Ms Kavita Jha, in fairness, does not dispute that such a circular exists and the procedure encapsulated therein is in....
TaxTMI