2022 (11) TMI 263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Mahesh Bhardwaj, Authorised Representative for the respondent ORDER ANIL CHOUDHARY: Heard the parties. 2. The issue in this appeal is whether the appellant have been granted correct amount of interest for the correct period on the deposit made during the investigation, pursuant to being successful in appeal. 3. The brief facts are that the appellant is a builder engaged in con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing appeal). The interest on balance amount was rejected. Further, interest was allowed for the period from date of filing appeal till the date of grant of refund. 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who vide impugned order have been pleased to reject the appeal vide impugned order dated 03/11/2020. Revenue had also filed Cross Appeal before the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... refund @12% P.A. 6. Opposing the appeal, learned AR relies on the impugned order, he further states that the notified date of interest under Section 35FF is 6%. 7. Having considered the rival contentions, following the ruling of the Division Bench in the case of Parle Agro Ltd. (Supra), I hold that the appellant is entitled to interest from the date of deposit till the date of refund @ 12% ....