Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (11) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vice Tax<br>HON'BLE MR. RAMESH NAIR , MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) Shri. S J Vyas and Shri. Rahul Gajera ( Advocates ) for the Appellant Shri. Tara Prakash , Assistant Commissioner and Shri. J. A. Patel , Superintendent ( AR ) for the Respondent ORDER RAMESH NAIR The brief facts of the case are that during the audit of the appellant's records, it was observed that the appellant have availed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....riginal filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who also conquering with the views taken by the Lower Authority upheld the Order-In-Original. Therefore, the present appeals filed by the appellant. 2. Shri S J Vyas, and Shri Rahul Gajera appeared for the appellants. Shri S J Vyas Learned Counsel submits that in this case the charge of suppression of fact has not been decided, therefore, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner (Authorized Representative) appeared on behalf of the Revenue in the matter of KKALPANA INDUSTRIES INDIA LIMITED and Shri R P Parekh, Learned Superintendent (Authorized Representative) appeared for the Revenue in the matter of NILKAMAL LTD, they reiterate the findings of the impugned order. 4. I have carefully considered the submission made by both the sides and perused the records. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es that there is a suppression of fact is only based on assumption and presumption, hence, the same is not sustainable. Since, there is no suppression of fact, Rule 9(1)(bb) is not applicable as held in the judgment cited by the Learned Counsel, accordingly, the appellants are entitled for the Cenvat credit. As regard, the cash refund of the said amount, even though there is no provision under Sec....