Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (10) TMI 825

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3,97,96,875/- under the head punitive charges in the profit and loss account. It was submitted that on verification it was noticed by the AO that the punitive charges was the charges levied by the East Coast Railway for transport of the excess material as prescribed by the railways. It was submitted by the ld. CIT-DR that as the punitive charges were crystal clear violation of the rules of railways, the levy has been made on the assessee and in view of the Explanation 1 to Section 37 of the Act the said expenses had been disallowed by the AO. It was further submitted that the ld. CIT(A) following the decision of the Nagpur Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Western Coalfields Ltd. Vs. ACIT, in ITA Nos.289 & 290/Nag/2006 and also the decis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to the railways authorities, which is a branch of Government of India, the punitive charges is not allowable as a deduction in view of the provisions of Explanation 1 to Section 37(1) of the Act. 3. In reply, ld. AR drew our attention to page 13 of the order of Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Taurian Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd., passed in ITA No.847&1613/Mum/2010, dated 14.12.2011, wherein in para 10.4, it has been held as under :- 10.4 Based on the arguments advanced by the assessee, the ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the A.O. by observing as under:- "The overloading charges paid by the appellant to the Railways are paid in the regular course of business in accordance with the notification iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....harges are computed as 2 times or 3 times of the freight rates. The punitive charges levied by Railways, in accordance with the notification of Ministry of Railways dated 23.12.2005, for carrying goods in its rakes are not "for any purpose which is an offense or which is prohibited by law‟. As a matter of fact, the Indian Railways itself permits carrying weight load beyond the permissible carrying capacity subject to payment of higher rate of freight by 2 times or 3 times. Though the words are "punitive charges‟, they are payment which are neither an offense nor is prohibited by the law rather the payment is in accordance with the law as provided in the notification of Ministry of Railways dated 23.12.2005. It is, therefore, hel....