2022 (10) TMI 148

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y was also announced by Commissioner (Appeals). 2. The facts in brief are as follows:- The appellants imported a Professional Survey Equipment with re-chargeable Battery, Tripod Mount etc. valued at Rs.9,67,095/- involving duty of Rs.266918/- on 22.08.2019 under the provisions of Notification No.04/2018 - Cus. dated 18.01.2018. The said goods were imported under Carnet No.CA191214 valid till 25.07.2020 for the purpose of demonstration of Professional Equipments. However, as per the condition of the said Notification the said imported goods were to be exported out of India within two months of its importation. The appellant could not re-export the same within the aforesaid time. Hence vide letter dated 13.11.2019 requested permission f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as imposed under section 112 of the Customs Act. Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld those findings except for reducing the redemption fine to Rs.50,000/-. Still being aggrieved the appellant is before this Tribunal. 4. I have heard Ms. Prabjyoti K. Chadha, ld. Counsel for the appellant and Shri Ishwar Charan, Authorised Representative for the Department. 5. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the goods were imported under a Carnet for temporary admission of goods under Notification No.04/2018. The said Notification had no provision for confiscation. Otherwise also the said carnet was guaranteed by Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in India (FICCI) as per the provisions of Customs Convention on ATA Carne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... While rebutting these submissions ld. D.R. has mentioned that the goods were imported under a Carnet guaranteed by FICCI in terms of the Notification No.04/2018. Conditions therein are utmost clear that the goods had to be re-exported in the stipulated time. Though the period could have been extended by the competent authority but in case of failure to re-export the goods within the period specified or extended as the case may be, FICCI and the importer were jointly and severally liable to pay the duties of Customs leviable on the goods as on date of import alongwith the applicable interest. It is submitted that in view of the said conditions, there is no infirmity in the order of Commissioner (Appeals). It is further impressed upon that o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en ordered in phases, to be excluded in computing the periods prescribed under requisite Legislation. 9. There also has been an Ordinance passed by Ministry of Law and Justice on 31.03.2020 to be called as Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 Section 3 thereof extends the time limit for completion or compliance of any required action to 30th day of June, 2020 or to such other date after June, 2020 as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf, provided the time limit for said action, under the specified Act, falls during the period from the 20th day of March, 2020, to the 29th June, 2020. 10. In the present case the extended time limit to re-export the goods expired on 21.....