Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (11) TMI 1264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on, the assessee had been carrying on the business of wall painting/ banners & hoarding and also doing the business of shares. He had filed his return of income declaring taxable income at Rs. 1,21,220/-. The AO noticed that as per AIR information, the assessee had done following transactions: Contractual receipts Rs. 40,58,051/- Payment to CITI Bank Credit card Rs. 2,48,143/- Share transactions with M/s India Bulls Securities Ltd. Rs. 3,62,52,919/- 2.1. The AO observed that these transactions were not declared by the assessee and were submitted only after the receipt of AIR information, supplied to him. From the copy of a/c of M/s India Bulls Securities Ltd., following information was noticed: "1. Assessee has made transaction of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... He submitted that default at best is of section 271A for not maintaining the books of account in respect of investments made, but not u/s 44AB. 3.1. Ld. counsel referred to the decision of Humble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Dr. K. Satish Shetty 310 ITR 366(Kar.), wherein it was held as under: "Held, that the assessee was under a bona fide belief that he was required to obtain audit report only in respect of that business, the turnover of which crosses the limit of Rs. 40 lakhs for each assessment year. From the conduct, behaviour and attitude of the assessee, it was clear that he was not aware that the aggregate of the three businesses had to be taken into consideration for compliance with the provisions contained in sec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ner (Appeals) was to be deleted." 3.3. Ld. counsel further submitted that the assessee had got his accounts audited by CA and had filed the tax audit report along with the income-tax return for the year under appeal. Photo copy of the tax audit report is contained at pages 31 to 38 of the PB. Further, the assessee had filed copy of the statements issued by India Bulls Securities Ltd., in respect of delivery account as well as in respect of Future & options before the CIT(A) and ITO. Dealings with the said share broker was only investment. In view of these facts, the CA did not take into account the said losses in respect of the said investments and tax audit report was made in respect of assessee's advertising business. 4. Ld. DR submitte....