Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (9) TMI 1229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R. Rajaraman, Assistant Commissioner (AR) - For the Respondent ORDER After allowing the EH petition filed by the appellant, with consent of both sides, the appeal is taken up for hearing as the issue involved is only whether appeal filed by the appellant before the Commissioner (Appeals) is time-barred. 2. On behalf of the appellant, Ld. Counsel Shri O.P. Khanduja appeared and argued the matter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Order-in-Original was signed only on 06.04.2015, there is no possibility of the appellant receiving the order on 09.03.2015 which was only an inadvertent mistake in mentioning the date of receipt of order in Form C.A.1. The Commissioner (Appeals) ought to have considered the said fact and heard the appeal on merits. The appeal has been filed before Commissioner (Appeals) on 13.08.2015. The appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e period of limitation. When it is obvious that the date mentioned in Form C.A.1 is an inadvertent error, the Commissioner (Appeals) ought to have considered the argument put forward by the appellant with regard to the error committed by them. 6. On perusal of the records, I am convinced that the OIO having been signed on 06.04.2015 and the impugned order having been received by the appellant onl....