Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (9) TMI 1197

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dents. 2. The present writ petition came to be filed, seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus to declare the Authorization for access to Business premises issued under Section 71(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short, "APGST Act"] by the first respondent dated 28.10.2021 in favour of the second respondent as contrary to Sub-Section 91 of Section 2 read with Section 5(1) and 5(3) of the APGST Act. 3. The facts, in issue, in the present writ petition, are as under:- (a) The petitioner was engaged in the business of works contracts and specialized in laying pipelines for water supply projects. He got registered as Special Class Contractor with RWS & Engineering Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... verification the truthfulness and correctness of the business transactions. The first respondent issued authorization through enforcement module following the procedure contemplated under law. Pursuant to the said authorization, the second respondent visited the petitioner's firm on 29.10.2021, on which date, copies of the documents were furnished and thereafter a notice was issued on 07.12.2021 calling for records relating to period from 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2021. At that point of time, the authorities were informed about the filing of the writ petition. (b) It is stated that the averment made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that when once the Chief Commissioner has authorized the Joint Commissioner of the D....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (3) The Chief Commissioner may, subject to such conditions and limitations as may be specified in this behalf by him, delegating his powers to any other officer who is subordinate to him. (4) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, an appellate authority shall not exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on any other officer of State Tax. Section 71(1) Access to business premises: (1) Any officer under this Act, authorized by the proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, shall have access to any place of business of a registered person to inspect books of account, documents, computers, computer programs, computer software whether installed in a computer or ot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spect books of accounts, documents, etc for Audit, Scrutiny, Verification". While in the column 'Designation of Officer authorised', it is mentioned as "JCST working in the divisions/Addl. CST/Commissioner ST working in the office of CCST entrusted with the enforcement activities". 12. From the above, it is very much evident that the Proper Officer for the functions referred to Section 71(1) of the Act, would be the three officers referred to in the column designation of officer authorized and one such Officer being Joint Commissioner (ST) working in the Division. In the instant case, as seen from the impugned proceedings, the authorization for access to business purpose under Section 71(1) of APGST Act was issued by Joint Commissione....