2022 (9) TMI 1172

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate Ms. Gargi Vyas sought to appear on behalf of the domestic industry at whose instance the proceedings regarding the Anti-Dumping Investigation concerning Imports of 'Stainless-Steel Seamless Tubes and Pipes' Originating in or Exported from China PR. Their stand was also considered. 2. Petitioner no.1 is an association of industries known as Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes Manufacturers Association, which claims to represent large number of Stainless-Steel Seamless Pipes & Tubes manufacturers in India. Petitioner No.1 has its registered office at Kalol in Gujarat. Petitioners no.2 and 3 member companies of petitioner no.1 and are also manufacturers of the same product operating from Gujarat. 2.1 Petitioners have prayed in this ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on 22.03.2022. (vii) On 25.03.2022, the Respondent No. 1 extended the original date to file the Rejoinder by 7 days, ie., till 29.03.2022. (viii) The interested parties were directed to submit their comments by 05.09.2022. (ix) On 05.09.2022, the Respondent No. 1 extended the original date of filing the comments to Disclosure Statement by one day, till 06.09.2022. (x) Thereafter, on 06.09.2022, the Petitioners submitted the Comments to the Impugned Disclosure Statement while objecting to the non-consideration of the Rejoinder and seeking fresh issuance of the Disclosure Statement after duly considering the arguments and evidence placed on record in the Rejoinder. 3.1 It is the grievance of the petitioners that the Impugned Disclosu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Director General of Trade Remedies, New Delhi, that the aforementioned representations dated 22.03.2022 as well as 06.09.2022 as given and submitted to the Designated Authority shall be duly considered by the Designated Authority. 5.2 Learned Additional Solicitor General referred to the decision of the Delhi High Court in Alleima Materials Technology (Jiangsu Co. Ltd) vs. Union of India and Ors. dated 06.09.2022 in W.P.(C) 12894/2022 & CM Nos.39167-69/2022, wherein the Delhi High Court had an occasion to deal with connected controversy arising out the same investigation exercise regarding imposition of anti-dumping duty on the very product. The petitioner therein was another objector who raised the objections on different ground. 5.3 Refe....