Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (9) TMI 965

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eclaring total income of Rs. 11,43,530/-. 4. The assessee had received intimation under section 143(1) of the Act dated 29.03.2019 vide No. CPC/1718/A3/1886472963 wherein the total income was determined at Rs. 15,41,050/- by inter alia disallowing the claim of set off of brought forward loss of Rs. 3,97,520/-. 5. Aggrieved by the order of CPC, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). Before the Ld. CIT(A) the grievance of the assessee was that the claim of set off of capital loss at Rs. 3,97,520/- which was brought forward from earlier years should have been allowed to assessee but the same has not been allowed to the assessee. 6. Before CIT(A) it was inter alia submitted that assessee had filed original return of inc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....scribed under section 139(1) of the Act. He submitted that thereafter pursuant to the notice u/s. 139(9) of the Act, to remove the defects filed in the original return of income, assessee had filed the revised return within the prescribed time. In such a situation, he submitted that since the revised return of income was in continuation to the original return of income filed by the assessee, it should be considered to have been filed in time. He submitted that the return filed to remove the defects u/s. 139(9) of the Act would be a correct return and would relate back to the date of filing of original return and, therefore, assessee should have been allowed the benefit of carry forward losses reflected therein. 10. The Ld. DR on the other ....