Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (9) TMI 397

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... year relevant for the purposes of this appeal, the appellant had imported 76,000 units of such empty cans vide Bill-of-Entry No. 7879073 dated 11.06.2020 through their Customs House Agent (CHA) which, after being selected for physical verification by the Customs Authorities, was held to be requiring licence for importing the same. Vide application dated 21.08.2020, the appellant sought clarification from the Public Information Officer/Assistant Commissioner of the Customs House, Chennai, under the RTI Act since, according to the appellant, there was no requirement of licence by the appropriate authority for importing the goods in question under the Gas Cylinders Rules, 2016 ("the Rules" for short). The Public Information Officer/Assistant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....but 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane. • 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane has a boiling point of (-)26.3°C and a critical temperature of 101°C. • This gas is packed in a liquefied form in the impugned goods using pumps located in the appellant's facility and remains packed in the cans in a liquefied form even at room temperature. • In other words, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane gas can be liquefied at temperatures above (-)10°C and therefore, it is not a 'permanent gas'. • The fact that the gas remains in a liquefied form even at room temperature indicates that it is not in the nature of 'liquefiable gas'. The type of 'liquefiable gas' covered under the Gas Cylinders Rules is that gas which can be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce, she would conclude that R134a, when compressed, would automatically become a liquefied gas and would fall within the definition of "compressed gas" under Rule 2(v) of the Rules ibid. 5.3 She would also refer to the Test Report of the Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organization (PESO) wherein the said authority has very conveniently replied to refer to Rule 2(xxiii) of the Rules ibid. 5.4 She would further refer to the Bill-of-Entry filed by the appellant through its CHA wherein, in the description column, the volume / capacity of the 'Empty Tin Can' has not been specified, for which reason the Adjudicating Authority has held that the capacity of the empty cans was more than 500 ml. 5.5 For the above reasons, she sought for uph....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... authorities become non-speaking orders. 8.2 Further, to add to the agony of the appellant, both the appellant as well as the Revenue had approached the authority under the Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organization (PESO) seeking clarification, but surprisingly, the said authority has issued an incomplete communication, to refer to Rule 2(xxiii) of the Rules ibid., and much worse is the communication issued by the Public Information Officer/Assistant Commissioner of the Customs House, Chennai. Both the authority under PESO as well as the Public Information Officer/Assistant Commissioner of Customs have replied to the application under the RTI Act in a slipshod manner, which is not in accordance with the requirement of the RTI Act. ....