Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (6) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....res seventy-four lakhs six thousand two hundred and ninety-nine and paise forty-four) and a penalty of equivalent amount of Rs. 117,74,06,299.44 paise has been imposed upon the Appellants. In addition, interest has also been levied under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which has not been quantified. 3. The Adjudicating Commissioner has confirmed the above demand of duty and levy of penalty amounting to over Rs. 235 crores against the Appellants denying them the benefit of Notification No. 13/2000-C.E., dated 1-3-2000. The said Notification reads as under "In exercise of the powers conferred by section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government hereby exempts such excisable goods specified in Chapt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the ore in the plant premises itself. The dispute now centres around the interpretation of the word "ore". Trade has represented that the raw 'ore' is excavated through a mining process and mines can never be a part of an integrated steel plant because of so many reasons like, safety (ores have to be extracted through blasting) and logistics. Therefore the normal practice is that after mining the ore is cleaned and washed and physically transported to the integrated steel plant, where the manufacturing process commences. However, field formation have taken the view that after washing and cleaning, the product no longer remains "ore" but becomes "ore concentrate" and as per heading 26.10, Ore and Ore Concentrate are two different excisable ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on of iron from iron ore) to steel-making (conversion of iron to liquid steel); (ii) casting (solidification of liquid steel); (iii) rough-rolling (reducing size of blocks into slabs/blooms); (iv) product-rolling (production of plates, sheets, billets, rods and other shapes). Various activities from iron-making through steel-making and product-rolling are carried out in an integrated steel plant, whereas in other steel plants, the starting material being steel scraps, iron-making and steel-making from iron are not involved. It is also common knowledge and a fact of history that TISCO is the first integrated steel plant which was set up in India even prior to independence as a shining example of a pioneer nationalist entrepreneur's effor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....clarify the legal position as it existed from the date of issue of the notification and there is no reason as to why the benefit of the same cannot be allowed to the Appellants. 8. The Appellants have also argued that a subsequent show cause notice dated 23-2-06 issued by the same Commissioner takes a contrary stand that ore concentrate is not a different commercial commodity and on that ground, a huge demand has been raised against the Appellants alleging irregular availment of CENVAT Credit. Confirmation of the present demand and raising of the sub sequent demand clearly indicate a state of confusion in which the Excise Authorities are working. 9. We are of the considered view that the expression "integrated steel plant" is not capable ....