Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (8) TMI 273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Pramod Kumar, JDR, for the respondent. [Order] - 1. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants herein are engaged in the manufacture of metallised aluminium paper and had availed modvat credit of Rs. 98,655/- vide RG-23 Part II entry dated 04/08/1990 on inputs, namely, evaporation boats, on the strength of bill of entry dated 18/07/1990 under the provisions of Rule 57A of the Central Ex....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....attach the assessable goods of the appellants for recovery of the interest amount. The assessees preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) against the attachment order dated 18/11/2005 which appeal was dismissed vide order dated 31/01/2006 as non-maintainable on the ground that such letter was not an appealable order; vide the communication dated 15/12/2006 the Range Superintendent onc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ility to interest was taken up with the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik, who had informed her view in the matter vide the letter dated 30/03/2006 and that the appellants had responded and asked for issue of appealable order vide their letter dated 08/05/2006. Hence this appeal.  2. I have heard both sides. I find that all along the assessees have been agitating the point that they are....