Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 242

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp;                                                           None, for the appellants. Shri M.K.A.K. Mo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aring V-guard brand were cleared on payment of duty. In respect of the Nirmal brand products, the respondents availed SSI exemption under Notifications No. 8/2000-CE and 8/2001-CE. As the respondents were found to have used common inputs without maintaining separate accounts as regards their receipt, consumption and inventory, proceedings were initiated as per Central Excise Rules. On conclusion o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y of common inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted final products. Accordingly, he upheld the order of the original authority. 4. In the appeal before the Tribunal, it is submitted that the respondents had stored the inputs used for dutiable goods and exempted goods separately. The demand was not sustainable as the same was made under Section 11A. They had maintained necessary ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1(CCR). The respondents have not advanced any evidence to controvert the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) that they had not maintained separate accounts of common inputs as required under the provisions of erstwhile  Rule 57AD of CER or, Rule 6 (3)(b) of CCR with effect from 21.06.01. As the respondents had failed to maintain separate accounts, they have to pay an amount equal to the 8% ....