Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 1334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) was passed by disallowing the claim of additional depreciation amounting to Rs. 59,10,918/- on the basis that the assessee does not fulfill the conditions under section 32(1) (iia) of the Act. In the second appellate proceedings before ITAT, ITAT after considering the submissions of the assessee, set aside and restored the issue back to the file of AO for consideration of depreciation as per law and taking into account the details submitted by the assessee. The AO passed order giving effect to the order of ITAT, which was further rectified vide order dated 23.3.2017. In the rectification order under section 143(3)/254/147 of the Act, on the issue of additional depreciation the AO granted relief of Rs. 37,48,136/- and sustained the disallo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... delete to the ground of appeal of the time of or before hearing. 4. Before us, Ld AR brought to our notice findings of Ld CIT(A) in para No. 2, 4, 5 and he brought to our notice the purpose of introduction of additional depreciation with effect from 1 April 2006. He brought to notice the reasons for enhancement of the additional depreciation from 10% to 20% and submitted that the main purpose is to encourage new investment in the manufacturing sector and in order to increase the installed capacity for availing the initial depreciation. He stressed the point that the relevance is for installation. Further he brought to our notice following case law:- i) PCIT vrs. IDMC Ltd. (2017) 78 taxmann.com 285 (Guj) ii) JCIT vrs. L....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... section, AD was allowed to the industry on the condition that the assets should have been acquired and installed after 31.3.2005. In our opinion, provisions of section 32(1)(iia) of the Act, do not requires that the P&M has to be put into use in the year in which it is acquired for the purpose of claiming AD. From the reading the explanatory notes; with regard to introduction of the section in the relevant year; it is evident that what is important and material is the year of acquisition in the case of ships or aircraft and the year of installation in the case of machinery or plant. If the installation of a plant is spread over more than a year, the relevant year for the grant of allowance would be the year in which the installation is com....