TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (8) TMI 869
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... "CM APPL. 33266/2022 6. This is an application whereby a direction is sought for compliance of the order dated 15.07.2022. 7. The matter was listed before the Court for the first time on 12.07.2022, when we had recorded the grievance of the petitioner that the provisional attachment order dated 31.12.2019 had lost its efficacy, and therefore, had to be withdrawn. 7.1 Given this fact, the matter was directed to be listed on 15.07.2022, with leave to Mr Singla to return with instructions in the matter. 7.2. On 15.07.2022, Mr Singla informed us that the provisional attachment order dated 31.12.2019 had not been extended and accordingly, the same would stand dissolved. 7.3. We were also informed by ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t from the statement of the affiant/Mr Surat Singh dated 18.07.2022, a photocopy of his Aadhar card. 10.1. Facially, the signatures on the Aadhar card seem to match the signatures on the affidavit accompanying the writ petition. 11. For the moment, we would require Mr Sethi to file an affidavit concerning the submissions made by him before us at the Bar today. 11.1. The affidavit will be filed within the next one week. 12. We may also record that the documents furnished by Mr Singla, also include a communication dated 25.07.2022 which has been addressed by Mr Priyadarshi Manish, Advocate, to Mr Mukesh Kumar, Superintendent; who, was instrumental in recording the statement of Mr Surat Singh. 12.1.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r Ravinder Baweja and that he was unaware of it's working. 3.3. To another query, as to whether he had interacted with Mr Gaurav Gupta, whose name had cropped-up in the statement made before the concerned officer by Mr Surat Singh, we are told by Mr Surat Singh that he has not interacted with Mr Gaurav Gupta. 4. We may also record that Mr Harsh Sethi has filed an affidavit dated 08.08.2022, in terms of our direction issued on 29.07.2022. 4.1. In the affidavit, Mr Sethi has confirmed the fact that both the petition and the affidavit were signed by Mr Surat Singh, albeit, in his presence. 5. Mr Aditya Singla, who appears on behalf of the respondent/revenue, has brought to our notice a series of orders passed in W.P.(C) No. 5769/20....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of the respondent/revenue, has returned with instructions. 2. We are informed by Mr Singla that the provisional attachment order dated 31.12.2019, has not been extended. 3. Accordingly, Mr Singla submits that the provisional attachment order issued qua the subject account, referred to in prayer clause (i) of the writ petition, stands dissolved. 4. Mr Singla says that the necessary instructions will be issued to the concerned bank by the respondent/revenue, within the next five days. 4.1 The statement made by Mr Singla is taken on record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the statement made by Mr Singla. 6. The pending application shall accordingly stand closed." 7. As i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cannot continue to operate. The said order is accordingly, recalled. 10.1. Consequently, the captioned writ petition, i.e., W.P.(C) 10456/2022, shall stand dismissed as, to say the least, the petition has been filed at the behest of a person who is, concededly, not managing the affairs of the petitioner concern. 11. As alluded to hereinabove, it appears that there is another entity which appears to have been floated by the same set of persons, i.e. M/s Global Suppliers; qua which as well Mr Surat Singh evidently, had no clue. 12. In the affidavit accompanying the instant writ petition, Mr Surat Singh has stated that it was drafted by the counsel on his instructions and that the facts stated therein are true and correct to the best ....