Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (8) TMI 736

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he following grounds of appeal:- "1. The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the penalty of Rs. 4,16,455/- under section 271(1)(C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, such penalty is requested to be deleted. Your appellant prays for leave to add, to alter and / or to amend the above ground before the final hearing of the appeal. Total tax effect Rs. 4,16,455/-" 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee in the present case is an individual and is engaged in the business of share trading. The AO in the present case received information from investigation wing Ahmadabad i.e. ADIT(inv), Unit-3 wherein it was found that the broker Mahipat Raichand Share Broker Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in client code modifications a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d comes to Rs. 4,16,455/- and maximum penalty leviable being 300% of tax sought to be evaded comes to Rs, 12,49,365/-. I, therefore, levy minimum penalty of Rs,4,16,455/-, u/s. 271(l)(c) of the Act." 3.1 Thereafter, in appeal, Ld. CIT(A) also confirmed the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act imposed by Ld. Assessing Officer with the following observations: "6.6 Despite giving ample opportunities as mentioned in para 5 above, the appellant had not furnished any submission or documentary evidence in support of his claim. It clearly shows that the appellant had nothing to explain or submit as regard taking artificial loss from the broker Mahipat Raichand Share Broking Pvt. Ltd'. through Client Code Modification. In the assessment ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....per the information received from the investigation wing. However, the first question that arises whether such client codes were modified at the instance of the assessee or there was some punching error at the end of the share broker. It is because the stock exchange permits the share broker to rectify the mistakes occurred while punching the data. If that be so, then there cannot be any fault which can be attributed to the assessee for the mistakes committed by the share broker. 15.3 Furthermore, the client code modifications give rise to the doubt/ suspicion which requires detailed investigations from the parties concerned to reveal the truth. Merely, there were client codes modifications carried out by the broker cannot the basi....