TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (8) TMI 306
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....>MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT - HC<br>Dated:- 25-7-2022<br>WRIT PETITION NO. 16921 OF 2022 - -<br>Indian Laws<br>HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA AND HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI) PETITIONER: SHRI SUDHANSHU VYAS, ADVOCATE RESPONDENTS: NONE ORDER JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA The petitioners / Union of India has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 21.02.202....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r, the petitioners have started recovery @ Rs.5,000/- per month from their salary. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid action, the respondents have approached the Central Administrative Tribunal inter alia on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice as before making such recovery, no opportunity was given to them, such an action is bad in law and liable to be set aside. 2.2. The petit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... work of ISEZ, Indore which made them entitle to get HRA @ 20%. After recording the finding, in paragraphs - 8, 9 & 10, the Central Administrative Tribunal has set aside the recovery. Hence, the present petition before this Court. 03. We have heard Shri Sudhanshu Vyas, standing counsel for Union of India and perused the record. 04. Undisputedly, before making such recovery, no enquiry was conduc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion of ISEZ located at Indore that has made them entitled to get HRA at higher HRA despite their regular posting at Pithampur. If the petitioners are disputing the entrustment of respondents' additional work of ISEZ then an enquiry ought to have been conducted to verify the facts that at the relevant point of time they were posted or not. 06. Shri Sudhanshu Vyas, learned counsel has contended....