Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (8) TMI 267

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....According to the appellant, they are engaged in the business of real estate. During the Financial Year 2007-08, they acquired a land situated at Siruseri admeasuring 65 cents for a sum of Rs.95,18,700/- through bank and during the Financial Year 2013-14 relevant to the assessment year 2014-15, the said property was sold to one Naveen Kochar by executing a general Power of Attorney dated 18.01.2003 for a total consideration of Rs.90,00,000/- which was received by cheques dated 31.08.2013 and 10.12.2013 for Rs.75,00,000/- and Rs.15,00,000/- respectively. The said Naveen Kochar thereafter, sold the said property to one M/s.Jacaranda Properties Pvt. Ltd. on 21.10.2013 for a total consideration of Rs.2,13,84,000/-, for which, the appellant neith....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore, the same is barred by limitation. Further, the second respondent failed to provide the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment and follow the mandatory procedure as laid down in the decision in GKN Driveshafts v. ITO [(2003) 259 ITR 19 (SC)]. Without considering these vital factors, the learned Judge erred in dismissing the writ petition, by granting liberty to the appellant to file statutory appeal before the authority concerned. Stating so, the learned counsel sought to allow this writ appeal by quashing the order impugned herein. 3.On the other hand, the learned senior panel counsel appearing for the respondents made his submissions to support the order passed by the learned Judge. 4.Heard the learned counsel for the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssioner of Income Tax and another [(2022) 326 CTR (SC) 574], wherein, it was held as under : "In view of the fact that certain matters concerning the assessee are pending consideration before the CIT(A) and both sides are agreeable that the matters pending before the CIT(A) be taken to logical conclusion, liberty is given to the assessee as well as the Revenue to agitate all the issues before the CIT(A) in the pending appeals; pending said disposal, status quo shall be maintained by the parties." 8.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and as agreed by the learned counsel appearing for both sides, this court, without going into the merits of the case, issues the following directions, in the light of the aforesaid d....