2022 (7) TMI 1095
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ome Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in ITA No. 6818/Del./2013 for the Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the ITAT has erred in confirming the order passed by CIT(A) deleting the additions of Rs.7,17,24,500/- made by assessing Officer on account of unexplained investment. He states that the ITAT has erred in confirming the order passed by CIT(A) without adhering to the principle of preponderance of probability as no ordinary prudent person would sell his shares at a loss of 90% within five days of purchase without receiving balance consideration outside books of accounts. 3. He also states that the ITAT has erred in holding that balance/trial sheet found during search being a public document is not an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... will have to be computed by the AOs as a fresh exercise. iii. The AO will exercise normal assessment powers in respect of the six years previous to the relevant AY in which the search takes place. The AO has the power to assess and reassess the 'total income' of the aforementioned six years in separate assessment orders for each of the six years. In other words there will be only one assessment order in respect of each of the six AYs "in which both the disclosed and the undisclosed income would be brought to tax". iv. Although Section 153 A does not say that additions should be strictly made on the basis of evidence found in the course of the search, or other post-search material or information available with the AO which can b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... this Court finds no ground not to follow the said judgment. 6. Further, in the present case, the Assessing Officer in the satisfaction note has recorded that the documents found during the search pertained to assessee and therefore it is a fit case for initiation of proceedings under Section 153C of the Act. However, the Assessing Officer failed to record as to how the documents found during search reflected any undisclosed income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer, without even demonstrating/or drawing any nexus of the seized documents with the undisclosed income of the assessee, merely on the ground that the seized documents belong to the assessee initiated proceedings under Section 153C of the Act, which is against the settled posi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Act unless the incriminating material belonging to the Assessee has been seized. 38. As indicated above, in the present case, the documents seized had no relevance or bearing on the income of the Assessee for the relevant assessment years and could not possibly reflect any undisclosed income. This being the undisputed position, no investigation was necessary. Thus, the provisions of section 153C, which are to enable an investigation in respect of the seized asset, could not be resorted to; the AO had no jurisdiction to make the reassessment under Section 153C of the Act." (ii) PCIT vs Dreamcity Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9624 "7. In the present case the search took place on 5th January 2009. Notice to the Assessee was issue....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....by the Assessing Officer of the person searched to the Assessing Officer of the third person. Mere use or mention of the word 'satisfaction' in the order/note will not meet the requirement of concept of satisfaction as used in Section 158BD. The satisfaction has to be in writing and can be gathered from the assessment order, if it is so mentioned/recorded, or from any other order, note or record maintained by the Assessing Officer of the person searched. The word 'satisfaction' refers to the state of mind of the Assessing Officer of the person searched, which gets reflected in a tangible shape/form when it is reduced into writing. It is the conclusion drawn or the finding recorded on the foundation of the material available. The word 's....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... faith rather than suspicion. Reliability, credibility or for that matter what weight has to be attached to the material, depends upon the subjective satisfaction of the Assessing Officer but definitely it is subject to scrutiny whether the satisfaction has a rational nexus or a relevant bearing to the formation of satisfaction and is not extraneous or irrelevant. The satisfaction must reflect rational connection with or relevant bearing between the material available and undisclosed income of the third person. The rational connection postulates and requires satisfaction of the Assessing Officer that a third person has 'undisclosed income' on the basis of evidence or material before him. The material itself should not be vague, indefini....