2022 (7) TMI 1019
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....GP AND MR PRIYANK LODHA FOR THE RESPONDENT ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA Heard learned advocate Mr. Bharat Raichandani with learned advocate Mr. Aditya R. Parikh with for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Krutik Parikh for respondent No.2 and learned advocate Mr. Priyank Lodha for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. 2. By invoking the writ jurisdiction of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt Corporation. Deed of Assignment-cum- Slup Deed dated 28.10.2010 was executed. Subsequently, the petitioner sold of the said property by sale deed dated 08.06.2018 transferring rights thereunder to one Siddharth Interchem Private Limited. It was stated that the said Siddharth Interchem Private Limited would be using the plot for manufacturing operations. It further appears that the petitioner re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed 28.05.2021, described by the petitioner as "recovery notice", we find that it is a mere communication from respondent No.3. We are at a loss at to why such communicative exercise has been undertaken by the department. Be that as it may. 4. We could immediately notice from the affidavit-in-reply dated 07.02.2022 affirmed by one Dr. Satish Dhavale, working as Additional Director General, Direc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....luntarily pay the applicable GST along with interest & penalty in view of the legal provisions quoted in the said letter. The petitioner has misconstrued this simple communication letter as recovery notice and filed the present petition taking such an insignificant ground. The correct course of action, as followed by the various other taxpayers to whom identical letter were issued on the same issu....


TaxTMI