Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 901

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....th Mr. Tushar Gupta and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocates. Respondent: Mr. Gaurav Jain with Ms. Akshita Goyal and Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocates. JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): 1. Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 16th February, 2021 passed by the ITAT in ITA No. 918/DEL/2010. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the Tribunal erred in holding that the pay....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....el is located along with all the furniture and fixtures which are the part of the hotel. 4. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the petitioner is the owner of a hotel known as 'Hotel Sea Rock' in Mumbai which was initially being managed by ITC Ltd. under the Hotel Operator Agreement effective from 1986. In 1993 the hotel was severely damaged as a result of bomb blast during the riots in Mu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 7. In the opinion of this Court, there has been no addition of capital asset of enduring nature in the hands of the respondent-assessee. In fact, after payment of Rs.30.86 crores there has been no change in the capital structure of the respondent-assessee. 8. It had paid Rs.30.86 crores to get back the possession of its own asset which had been given on license basis under the Hotel Operator ....