Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 799

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....019 2. 2013-2014 E.O.C.No.149 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No.16387    of 2019 3. 2015-2016 E.O.C.No.151 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No.23229    of 2019 (ii) Prosecution under Section 276 C (1) of the Income Tax Act. 1961 Sl. No. Assessment Year Complaint on the file of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Quash petition on the file of High Court, Madras 1. 2010-2011 E.O.C.No.152 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No.23330    of 2019 2. 2011-2012 E.O.C.No.153 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No.23252    of 2019 3. 2012-2013 E.O.C.No.154 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No.23327    of 2019 4. 2013-2014 E.O.C.No.155 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No.23332    of 2019 5. 2014-2015 E.O.C.No.156 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No.23320    of 2019 6. 2015-2016 E.O.C.No.157 of 2018 Crl.O.P.No. 23324 of 2019 3. According to the Income Tax Department, the petitioner herein, an income tax assessee having taxable income failed to file her Return of Income for the Assessment Years 2011 to 2016. She also failed to pay the tax due before the due date of filing the return o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat the show cause notice was not properly served on her. The copy of the show cause notice was not furnished to her representative. No communication received after payment of tax due. No summons was issued based on the complaint. Only on hearing from the News through visual media that the trial Court has issued NBW on 06/03/2019, she came to know about the prosecution, which was launched with malafide after receiving the entire tax due. 8. The details of payment of tax for the respective Assessment Years, with challan numbers and date mentioned in the petitions as under:- A.Y Balance Tax Paid BSR Code Date Challan No. 2016-17 51,810 0013283 20.02.2018 03013 2015-16 1,20,860 0004329 20.02.2018 05618 2013-14 2,49,940 0004329 14.02.2018 00452   7,240 0004329 14.02.2018 00452 2012-13 5,01,670 0013283 14.02.2018 00458 2011-12 1,48,800 0004329 14.02.2018 00425 2010-11 93,590 0013283 14.02.2018 00438 9. The Leaned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that, the assessment made by the Department is under challenge and in so far as prosecution launched f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h replies were filed and the reasons given by the petitioner for violation of the Income Tax Act were not found to be plausible and hence sanction for prosecution was accorded to proceed under Section 276CC & 276C(1) of the Income tax Act. Accordingly the complaints were filed before the Economic Office Court (II) at Egmore. There was no voluntary compliance of the statutory requirement by the petitioner which amounts to violation of the Income Tax Act thereby attract protection for the offences under Section 276CC, Section 276C(1) of Income Tax Act 1961. If not for the investigation proceedings, the assessee would have not come forward to file her returns and the exchequer would have been deprived of its legitimate dues. Thus, the willful element which is sine qua non is very much present in the case of the petitioner. 13. The Act of the petitioner by filing the returns upon detection and with concealed income which is violation of the statute thereby constitutes an offence. Thus, the accused cannot be given a clean chit, and her default is willful. If the timelines and schedules as per the laws are not followed, then it would adversely impact the Government's revenue inter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 16. Followed by Jayappan case, there are a catena of judgments of this Court as well as the Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein it is held that the pendency of appeal before the Tax Appellate Authority cannot be a bar for prosecuting the assessee for not filing the Return in time or for the attempt to evade tax. 17. In this case, the facts reveals that from the financial years starting from 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 till the show cause notice issued to the assessee, she has not filed Returns for her individual income and her belated return, on investigation found omission of certain income. Particularly, source for payment through credit cards, interest accumulated in fixed deposits etc. were deducted and therefore, the prosecution has been launched. 18. The undisclosed income for each of the Assessment Years, deducted by the Department in the course of investigation are:- Financial Year Assessment Year Undisclosed Income (In Rs.) 2009-10 2010-11 4,48,116 2010-11 2011-12 5,76,079 2011-12 2012-13 11,42,342 2012-13 2013-14 10,34,354 2013-14 2014-15 20,17,717 2014-15 2015-16 10,82,465 19....