TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (9) TMI 1632
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....has consequently refused to consider the claim petition on merits and has thus dismissed the claim petition also. 3. Shri Madan, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants, submits that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and in the personal search immediately carried out after occurrence of the accident, a ticket was found with him. Learned counsel further submitted that the present appellants being not aware of the provisions of law and for lack of appropriate advice, could not file the petition within the stipulated time. It was further contended by the appellants that one of their relatives advised them to contact one lawyer and accordingly papers were handed over to the said lawyer, however, the said lawyer did not prepare the pe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hat the Tribunal has considered each and every ground raised in the application for condonation of delay and has passed a well reasoned order dealing with each of the said point. Learned counsel submitted that the Tribunal has also observed that false statements are made in the application for condonation of delay which are not supported by any necessary particulars. Learned Counsel placed his reliance on the unreported judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Brijesh Devi vs. Union of India, decided on 4th November, 2009 and submitted that no interference is required in the impugned judgment and order. 6. After having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties and on perusal of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the application for condonation of delay. Merely because the claimants did not provide the particulars as to which Police Station they had visited for getting the documents, that who was the Advocate who kept pending file with him for two years, that who was the relative who suggested the name of the said Advocate and that, who was the friend of the claimants who ultimately properly guided the claimants for filing the petition before the appropriate Court, no such inference can be drawn that the claimants have come out with a false justification and that whatever reasons are assigned by the claimants, are false or bogus. The claimants were not going to be benefited because of delay in filing the claim petition. It is, thus, evident that the....