Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 586

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....leting the addition of Rs.4,02,000/- u/s 69C of the Act (Commission). 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income declaring total income of Rs.28,43,280/-. The AO notes that the assessee is engaged in the activity of Manufacturing Aluminium Roll Bond Evaporator Panel and assessee has shown the income from profit and gains from business and profession. The case was selected for scrutiny. According to the AO, he received an information from the office of Investigation Wing, Mumbai that the assessee has availed the accommodation entry from Bhanwarlal Jain Group who gives accommodation entry. 4. According to the AO the information from the Investigation Wing was that there was a search/survey action con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Shri Bhanwarlal Jain Group is centralized for assessment) was communicated about the facts produced by the assessee and requested to provide the ledger account of M/s Chanvim Engineering (India) Private Limited for A.Y. 2013-14 and A.Y. 2014-15. The DCIT, CC 1(3), Mumbai, vide letter dated 08.03.2016, communicated the information and ledger account. On perusal of the information and documents, the contention of the assessee is found correct. Hence, the scrutiny assessment will be completed for the following financial transactions: - S. No. Name Particulars of Transactions (Financial Year and Amount) 1 Look At Me Retail Pvt. Ltd. 2012-13 1,11,00,000/- 2 Meridiann Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. 2012-13 50,00,000 3 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rted that the transactions through banking channels, the fact of deduction tax(TDS) is not relevant because of statement of Sh. Banwarlal Jain during the search. It is undisputed fact that the loans was received through banking channel and the amount taken as loan was subsequently fully returned back along with interest through banking channels. The corresponding interest amount was offered as income by the lender parties and the department has on its record the trail of the income through TDS deducted and paid. The TDS payment is accepted by the Department which reflects that the interest payment is also accepted by the Department and therefore, the loan transaction cannot be alleged to be accommodation entries. The addition is merely on t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d much reliance on the modus operandi of Banwarlal Jain group and concluded that the assessee had entered into bogus loan transaction with them, and added the amount of loan. The Ld. CIT(A) also took note of the fact that the assessee in order to prove the loan transactions had submitted before the AO, documents evidencing the entire trail of the transaction, which the AO ignored and has not found any infirmity in the documents produced by the assessee to support the genuineness of the loan. The Ld. CIT(A) noted that AO on the strength of the statement of Shri. Banwarlal Jain recorded during the search has brushed aside the relevant facts that the transaction in question (loan) happened through banking channel and TDS has been duly deducted....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion to prove that the assessee has indulged in taking accommodation entry from the aforesaid lenders. The Ld. CIT(A) also took note that even during the search the cash trail has not been identified to bring on record that the assessee had given cash in lieu of the purported loan/accommodation transaction by exposing that the cash given by assessee was deposited in some bank account which was routed to the entities/lenders which gave loans to the assessee. On the aforesaid finding of relevant facts of the Ld. CIT(A), he gave relief to the assessee. 9. Before us, the revenue could not point out any error in the finding of fact discussed (supra). In the light of the uncontroverted finding of facts by the Ld CIT(A), according to us, the ass....