Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 131

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....earned counsel Counsel for the respondents : Ms. Monika Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India : Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 : Mr. Vinod Kumar Nautiyal, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent No. 3 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi) Issue no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f entry No. 74 of exemption Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, classified under SAC Heading 9993. 4) The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner approached the Authority for Advance Ruling with a view to seek the ruling to the effect that the Naturopathy Centre run by the petitioner is exempt from payment of GST under the aforesaid exemption Notification No. 12/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Authority. However, the Appellate Authority has not considered the said aspect in its impugned order. 5) The learned counsel for the respondents are not in a position to dispute the aforesaid submission of the petitioner. This is also evident from the reading of the impugned orders passed by the respondent Authorities. 6) In the light of the aforesaid, we quash and set aside the order dated....