Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 92

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er, they have not discharged the service Tax on due dates. Subsequently, they have paid Service Tax along with interest on 1st December, 2005. Thereafter, the show cause notice was issued on 12.03.2017 proposing penalty under Section 78. The adjudicating authority has confirmed the penalty of 200% of the Service Tax amount which amounts to Rs. 2089838/-. The appellant being aggrieved by the imposition of penalty filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who has upheld the penalty, therefore, the present appeal filed by the appellant. 2. Shri. Vipul Khandhar, Learned Chartered Accountant, appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant paid the Service Tax with interest before the issuance of the show cause notice and t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....MODERN BUSINESS SOLUTIONS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, AHMEDABAD-2019 (24) GST; 353 (Tri.,- Ahmd) * INDUS GLOBAL LTD Vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, VADODARA - 2015 (38) STR 14 (Guj.) * PEARL TRAVELS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF C.EX & S.T., DAMAN - 2020 (37) GSTL 242 (Tri.- Ahmd) 4. I have carefully considered the submission made by both the sides and perused the records. I find that the limited issue to be decided in this case is that in the facts and circumstances of the present case whether the appellant is liable for penalty under Section 78 or otherwise. I find that this is not the case where the appellant have supressed the transaction of services whereas, they have issued the legitimate invoices wherein they have shown t....