Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (7) TMI 20

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fter called the Act, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, has referred the following questions of law to this court for its opinion: " (i) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the IAC had jurisdiction to levy penalty for the A.Y. 1970-71 after the amendment of section 18(3) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975 ? ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore, initiated against the assessee and forwarded to the IAC as the amount of penalty exceeded a sum of Rs. 25,000 in each case. The IAC, after considering the material on record, imposed penalties amounting to Rs. 1,00,000 and Rs. 60,000, respectively, for the two years in question. Against that order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal. It was contended on behalf of the assess....