2022 (6) TMI 1101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts of the case, the worthy CIT(A) has erred in sustaining a part of the addition to the extent of Rs. 2,50,000/- out of Rs. 3,62,607/- made by Ld. ITO on the ground of non-availability of vouchers etc. in support of expenses claimed in books of account. 2. The worthy CIT(A) has erred in partly upholding the action of Ld. ITO as stated in (1) above without appreciating the fact that Ld. ITO has not specifically pointed to any particular voucher or documentary evidence not made available to him. 3. On circumstances and facts of the case, the worthy CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the additions made by Ld. ITO were made in a routine & perfunctory manner without application of mind & deserved to be deleted i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts have been placed on record. 6. For the sake of clarity, the written arguments filed by the assessee are reproduced as under: "This is an appeal against the order of the worthy CIT(A), Jammu dated 28-02-2018 for Asstt. Year 2013-14 THE FACTS OF THE CASE: The appellant assessee is a running a business of electric motors & allied items. For Asstt. Year 2013-14, the Ld. ITO completed the assessment under section 143(3) of IT Act. An addition of Rs. 3,62,607/- was made by him to the returned income of Rs. 10,75,020/- & partly upheld by worthy CIT(A) to the extent of Rs. 2,50,000/- NOW THE ARGUMENTS GROUND NOS. 1 to 5 Your Honour- As is a common knowledge, various expenses have to be inc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is fact to the detriment of appellant assessee & proceeded ahead to sustain the addition of Rs. 2,50,000/- Your honor,- An injustice has been done to appellant assessee in sustaining the addition of Rs. 2,50,000/- on mere lumpsum basis which is neither backed by any details or logic but only surmise & conjectures seemingly without going the assessment. Even for argument sake, if sum-total of freight & advertisement 24,13,840/, is taken out of the targeted pool of expenditure, what remains is only 12,12,234/- on which an addition of Rs. 2,50,000/- sustained by worthy CIT(A) is highly unjustified. Secondly the expenses have been wholly & solely incurred for business purposes & need not be added back. Thirdl....