TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (1) TMI 1978
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rashtra in the form of Octroi Refund of Rs.1,68,52,440/- as capital subsidy. 2. Whether on the fact and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) was right in treating Octroi refund as capital subsidy without appreciating the fact that it was given for as an assistance for carrying on the business of the assessee and not for acquiring a capital asset. 3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A)-1, Nashik erred in ignoring the facts that the assessee company had not filed any revised return of income to make such claim that Octroi refund received from Govt. of Maharashtra is capital receipt and had made the said claim only during assessment proceedings? 4. The appellant prays that the order of the ld. CIT(A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs 351 ITR 309 held Octroi refund as capital in nature. 5. The ld. Authorized Representative further submitted that assessee received Octroi refund incentive under Maharashtra Government Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007. The scheme is similar to Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. The Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs. M/s. Universal Construction Machinery and Equipments Ltd. in ITA No.2312/PUN/2016 for A.Y. 2012-13 decided on 03-08-2018 following the decision rendered in the case of CIT Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. 339 ITR 632 held that subsidy received by the assessee therein is capital in nature. The case of the assessee is squarely covered by aforesaid decision of the Tribunal. 6. On the other hand Shri Sudhe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt of Rs.2,36,05,000 / - is stated to be receivable as on 31-03-2012. The subsidy was sanctioned to the assessee under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007 of the State Government, against investment of Rs.26.77 crores made by the assessee in land, factory building, plant and machinery, electrical installation etc. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) granted relief to the assessee by following the order of Tribunal in the case of M/ s. John Deere Equipments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (supra). We find that the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the aforesaid case has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. reported as 339 ITR 632, wherein subsidy sancti....