Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (6) TMI 788

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Both the appeals filed by the assessee delayed by 79 days for the assessment year 2010-11 and 275 days for the assessment year 2013-14. By filing a petition for condonation of delay in the form of an Affidavit for both the assessment years explaining detailed reasons for the delay, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has prayed for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals for adjudication. The ld. DR has not seriously objected to the submissions of the ld. Counsel. Since the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause for the delay in filing the appeals before the Tribunal, the delay in filing the appeals before the Tribunal are condoned and admitted the appeals for adjudication. 3. The first effective ground raised in the appeal for th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome at Rs. 12,41,720/- by disallowing Rs. 5,92,160/- claimed to be expenses in relation to earning of remuneration and interest income of Rs. 12,82,139/-. On appeal against the disallowance of expenses of Rs. 5,92,160/-, after considering the submissions of the assessee, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. 4.2. Similar claim of expenses of Rs. 6,12,548/- in the assessment year 2013-14 is also subject matter in appeal since the ld. PCIT has passed revision order under section 263 of the Act directing the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment. 4.2. On being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has erroneously held that there is no nexus between....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....concluded first and thereafter the appeal proceedings was also concluded. In the assessment year 2010-11, the assessee has claimed expenses of Rs. 5,92,160/- for earning income. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of expenses on the ground that the assessee could not file any books of accounts or any evidence in support of expenses incurred by the assessee and their nexus to the remuneration earned by the assessee. 4.5. On perusal of the appellate order, it would be evident at page 3 of the order, wherein, in the grounds of appeal, the assessee has submitted that against the explanation called by the Assessing Officer, the assessee has furnished copy of the reply submitted to the ld. CIT during revision proceedings. It was also su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion of work to the assessee-partner, such as, day-today banking operations, collections from parties in and around Chennai, staff management, production supervision, stock management & control and general office administration, etc., the assessee has engaged employees and made payments from her own remuneration. In fact, as per work allocation, the assessee-partner was permitted to hire personnel to assist her in clerical works by way of paying salary to them out of her share of partner salary received by her without any further delegation from the firm. On perusal of the details of employees engaged by the assessee and confirmation letters of having receipt of salary and also proved identity of the employees beyond doubt for the assessmen....