Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (6) TMI 433

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... exemption as available against entry no. 457 (I) of Notification No.46/2011- CUS. It is the department‟s case that the appellant have wrongly classified the item under 39029000 as it should have been classified under CTH 39069090 as any Acrylic Polymers. The adjudicating authority by passing adjudication order re-classified the goods under CTH 39069090. Consequently, exemption claimed by the appellant was denied however, the benefit of concessional rate of duty was extended, in serial no. 466 and accordingly, differential duty, liability was confirmed. Being aggrieved by the Order-In-Original, the appellant filed appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) who upholding the classification of said product under 39069090 and consequentia....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....other" and a tariff heading 3902 providing for polymers of propylene of other olefins in primary forms. It is relevant to note that the above classification was being historically followed by the appellant and has never been questioned by the customs authority. He further submits that chapter note 4 to chapter 39 of Customs provides that the classification should be on the basis of pre-dominant constituents of co-polymers units of polymers. In the present case, the pre-dominant constituent is butadiene which is in the nature of olefin which covers under Tariff Heading 3902 under the entry "Polymer of other olefins in primary form‟. Therefore, the product imported by the appellant is correctly classifiable under CTH 39029000 and not un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... nomenclature of the product i.e. picking up words Acrylic Polymer from the constituents of product in question. We find that the revenue has not firstly conducted any chemical test of the product to ascertain the composition of the product. Moreover despite considering the composition of the product they only picked up one of the constituent i.e. acrylic ester. For the ease of reference the composition of product given as under: Product Methyl Methacrylate Butadiene Styrene Acryl Ester Kane Ace B-564 18.5-23.5% 67.5-72.5% 2.5-7.5% 2.5-7.5% From the above composition it is undisputed that the pre-dominant constituent is butadiene having 67.5-72.5%. To classify any polymer product under Chapter 39 the r....