Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (9) TMI 1388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Intervener. JUDGMENT By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) (a) By way of writ, order or directions the respondents may very kindly be directed to clear the lien note (Rapat No.628) given on the revenue Record of bid property and transfer the same in the name of the petitioners, within short stipulated time; (b) By way of, the writ, order or directions, respondent No.2 may very kindly be directed to pay 18% interest on the initial bid amount taken by them from petitioners." 2. Facts are not much in dispute. Respondent No.1 invited bids for the sale of property of M/s Shivalik Fibers Pvt. Limited, situated at Muhal Ranguwal, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. under the SARFAESI Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he petitioners and to direct respondents No.2 and 3 to clear the lien note (Rapat No.628) given on the revenue Record of bid property and transfer the same in the name of the petitioners, within short stipulated time. 4. The respondents have not disputed the factum of the issue raised in the present petition being covered by the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2017, titled as Punjab National Bank and others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, decided on 19.05.2021. However, learned Additional Advocate General submits that the petition be disposed of in terms of the above judgment, but without prejudice to the legal rights of the respondent/State as the State intends to challenge the judgment passed by this Court in....