Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (6) TMI 322

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessment of bills of entry before the Commissioner (Appeals). Accordingly, the appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) were filed against the bills of entry whereas no speaking order was passed by the assessing authority. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed bills of entry for clearances of material of aluminum scrap and declared the value as mentioned in invoices. The goods were examined and found as per declaration but assessing officer rejected the declared value and enhanced the same on the basis of guidelines issued under F. No. VAL/TECH/36/2016 (AL Scrap) dated 01.12.2016, issued by DGoV. The appellant explained to the assessing officer that their declared value are true transaction value being a neg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rds the issue that, after acceptance by the assessee whether they have the right to challenge the assessment by filing appeal or not, the appellant have relied upon the following judgments:- (a) Chaudhary International vs. CC, Bombay - 1999 (109) ELT 371 (Tri.) (b) Dunlop India Ltd. & Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. vs. Union of India - 1983 (13) ELT 1566 (SC) (c) Union of India vs. Madhumilan Syntax Ltd. - 2006 (195) ELT 141 (SC) (d) CCE, Indore vs. Hingora Industries Ltd. - 2009 (237) ELT 318 (Tri.) (e) CC, New Delhi vs. Ganesh Trading Company reported in 2013 (297) ELT 75 (Tri.); (f) CC, Delhi vs. Maruti Fabrics - 2016 (343) ELT 963 (Tri.) (g) Mohan Textiles Mills vs. CCE & ST, Lu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n (P) Ltd. - 2007 (214) ELT 3 (SC). (z) Century Metal Recycling Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. UOI - 2019 (367) ELT 3 (SC) (za) CCE & ST Noida vs. Sanjeevani Non-Ferrous Trading (P) Ltd. - 2019 (365) ELT 3 (SC) (zb) BBM Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs. Comm. of Customs (Prev.) Delhi - 2021 (376) ELT 743 (Tri. Del.) 4. The Revenue also relied upon the decision which was cited by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) in his order and they have also relied upon the decision of the CESTAT's Principal Bench in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s. Hanuman Prasad & Sons - Order No. 51584-51619/2020 dated 20 October 2020. We find that on the issue that whether the assessee is entitled to challenge the assessment after giving acceptan....