Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (5) TMI 1213

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....udicial Member This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-IV, Kanpur dated 16.01.2017. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, during the year under consideration, the assessee had sold plot on which long term capital gain (LTCG) of Rs. 22,62,367/- has been declared in his return of income filed under Section 139 of the Act. Out of LTCG, Rs. 13,95,000/- has been ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion 54F of the Act, which is available with reference to the quantum of 'net consideration' received on the transfer giving rise to the capital gains and the cost of newly acquired house property and not with reference to the immediate source of the money for its acquisition besides proceedings u/s. 153 Aof the Act are aimed at making de novo assessments and are not akin to proceedings un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der came to be passed under section 217(1)(c) of the Act on 14-08-2015 by imposing a minimum penalty of Rs. 1,76,940/- upon the assessee. 4. As against the penalty order dated 14-08-2015, the assessee had preferred an appeal before the CIT(A)-IV, Kanpur. The CIT(A) vide order dated 16.01.2017 dismissed the appeal in the absence of the assessee and the representative of the assessee. 5. Aggrieved....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsidering the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case set out in his statement of facts itself. On perusal of the Order of the Ld. CIT(A), we found that on 02/12/2016, 26/12/2016 and on 12/01/2017 none appeared for the assessee and application seeking adjournment is also not filed, and therefore, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on 12/01/2017. 8. Since the Appeal before the CIT(A) ....