2022 (5) TMI 1052

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Krina Calla, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ORAL ORDER 1. Rule. Ld. APP waives Rule for the respondent State. 2. By way of present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner being an authorized person of S.K. Industries, challenges the impugned orders dated 26.10.2021 and 08.12.2021 passed by the Courts below, rejecting the release of muddamal - base oil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., vehicle as well as base oil have been seized. The petitioner herein moved an application before the trial Court for releasing of muddamal, which came to be rejected vide order dated 26.10.2021 and the same was challenged before the Sessions Court concerned by preferring Revision Petition, which came to be rejected vide order dated 08.12.2021. Aggrieved with the impugned orders passed by the Cour....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the police station. Therefore, it was urged that, seized muddamal base oil may be released on any terms and conditions. 5. On the other hand, learned APP Mrs. Krina Calla, for the State vehemently opposed the petition contending that, the learned Courts below have not committed any error of law while rejecting the applications and therefore, no case is made out for warranting interference by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat there may not be further chance of tempering with the articles etc. 7. In the facts of the present case, after following procedure, the seized base oil, imported by the petitioner herein and after clearance of the port authority, it was about to reach at the destination. Pursuant to the FIR, samples were taken from the seized oil. The petitioner herein is authorized person of the company. In ....