2009 (1) TMI 935
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1. The appellant is engaged in the business of interior designing and furnishing. They undertake contracts for the said purpose, which inter alia includes manufacture of various furniture items at site. The impugned demand stands confirmed against the appellant by arriving at a finding that they have manufactured furniture and have cleared the same without payment of duty. 2. It is seen that the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ixed piece by piece at site. We also note that an identical dispute dealing with identical pleas raised by the assessee was the subject matter of the Tribunal's decision in the case of Interscape v. CCE, Calcutta- I. As such, we are of the view that the legal issues having been settled in the above judgment, the present appeal is required to be re-adjudicated in the light of the same. At this ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e question of discharge of duty liability by the appellant on the basis of the contracts with the Principals and sub-letting the actual works to other parties at site, but retaining overall control of these activities. Therefore, liability of duty has occurred on a point of law and consequently there existed a reasonable basis for doubt in discharge of duty liability. I, therefore, accept the clai....