Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (5) TMI 361

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Appeals)-6 ("CIT(A)") is bad both in the eye of law and on facts. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) and AO have erred both on facts and in assessing the income of the appellant at an income of Rs.19,53,840 as against income of Rs.14,160 declared by the appellant. 3. That the CIT(A) and AO have erred on facts and in law in holding an addition of an amount on account of bogus purchases of Rs.18,65,080 and commission expenses of Rs.74,603. 4. That the addition has been made grossly indulging in surmises without bringing on any direct evidence against the assessee, only on the basis of presumption and assumptions. 5. That the CIT(A) and AO have erred on facts and in law in not conside....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ity to cross examine is violation of principle of natural justice. 11. That the CIT(A) and AO have erred both on facts and in law in charging interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. The appellant craves leave to add to, alter, amend or vary the above grounds of appeal at or before the time of hearing." 2. At the time of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. It is seen from the record that since 22.12.2020, no one has been appearing on behalf of the assessee. The notice sent by the Registry through speed post has returned back unserved by the Postal authority with the comment "no such person". The assessee has not provided current address to the Registry. Therefore, the appeal is taken up for hearing....