Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (4) TMI 1227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds:- "1. Because, the learned Assessing Officer erred in making ad-hoc disallowances of Rs. 3,62,366, on account of deemed dividend without considering the business exigency and other fact of the case. 2. Because, the learned Assessing Officer erred in making ad-hoc disallowances of Rs. 27,615, on account of depreciation with unjustified reasons." 3. When the appeal was called for hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee to present the case. There is no application seeking adjournment either. On perusal of the record, it is observed that on immediate four previous occasions also no one appeared on behalf of the assessee, however, prior to that the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,49,600 from both the companies during the relevant financial year. In order to further verify applicability of section 2(22)(e) of the Act, the assessee was asked to furnish copy of share capital account in the books of aforesaid 2 companies. On perusal of Ledger, the Assessing Officer found that percentage of the shareholding of the assessee in M/s Rustagi Projects and M/s Yen Pulses Private Limited was 95% and 50% respectively. The Assessing Officer also found from the balance sheet of M/s Rustagi Projects that the accumulated profit as on 31.03.2011 was Rs. Nil and as on 31.03.2012 was Rs. 3,39,021. Further the accumulated profit in M/s Yen Pulses Private Limitedas on 31.03.2012 was Rs. 79,000. As, both the companies were privately held....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a company in which the public are substantially interested, of any sum (whether as representing a part of the assets of the company or otherwise) made after the 31st day of May, 1987, by way of advance or loan to a shareholder, being a person who is the beneficial owner of shares (not being shares entitled to a fixed rate of dividend whether with or without a right to participate in profits) holding not less than ten per cent of the voting power, or to any concern in which such shareholder is a member or a partner and in which he has a substantial interest (hereafter in this clause referred to as the said concern) or any payment by any such company on behalf, or for the individual benefit, of any such shareholder, to the extent to which th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... include all profits of the company up to the date of liquidation, but shall not, where the liquidation is consequent on the compulsory acquisition of its undertaking by the Government or a corporation owned or controlled by the Government under any law for the time being in force, include any profits of the company prior to three successive previous years immediately preceding the previous year in which such acquisition took place." As per the provision of Explanation 2, all the profits of the company up to the date of distribution or payment under section 2(22)(e) of the Act shall be considered as accumulated profits. Thus, the provision of Explanation 2 to section 2(22) of the Act does not distinguish between the profit accumulated in....