Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (4) TMI 1095

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned standing counsel for the respondents. The petitioner is a trader of iron and steel. According to the petitioner he sold 10090 Kg TMT Bar valued at Rs. 4,16,717/- to M/s. Umar Enterprises, Ghaziabad, through invoice No.747, dated 04.03.2022. It is the case of the petitioner that he and the buyer both are registered dealers. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 2017 was issued in the name of the driver, namely Sachin Kumar, without fixing any date either for submitting reply or for personal hearing. Since the notices were issued by the respondent no.3 by creating temporary ID in the name of Sachin Kumar and the password was not known to the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner submitted his reply dated 16.03.2022 before the respondent no.3. However, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... thereof has been produced before us. In the said instructions, the respondent no.3 has merely reiterated his order passed under Section 129(1)(b) of the Act. It is admitted case of the respondents that the invoice accompanied with the goods in question was issued by the petitioner. Therefore, the respondent no.3 has committed a manifest error of law not to afford any opportunity of hearing to th....