TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (4) TMI 595
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Standing Counsel. Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Madhur Aggarwal and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advocates. J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. Present batch of appeals has been filed raising a common question of law, namely, as to whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'Tribunal') was correct in allowing the appea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....out any discrimination. Such a finding of Ld. CIT(A) was accepted by the Revenue and while preferring ITA No. 3403/Del/2014 in respect of the Assessment Year 2010-11, the Revenue did not challenge this finding of the Ld. CIT(A). 38. When a similar question had arisen for the Assessment Year 2011- 12 before the Ld. CIT(A), Ld. CIT(A) observed that the facts are identical to the Assessment Year 2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....essment Year 2011-12 by placing the material that was available before the Assessing Officer to reach a conclusion that the provisions under section 13(1)(b) of the Act are applicable to the facts of the case. In the absence of any such collaborative piece of material, we find it difficult to disturb the factual finding written by the Ld. CIT(A). We, therefore, while confirming the findings of the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....paper-book, this Court finds that both, the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) and Tribunal, have given a concurrent finding of fact that the benefit of scholarship to the poor and needy students was not confined to students of a particular community and a perusal of the list submitted by the assessee showed that the benefit had been granted to students from all communities without any discriminatio....