Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (4) TMI 250

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Appellant imported various inputs and capital goods for the manufacture of final goods. The Appellant was availing the benefit of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) Scheme. Further, the Appellant was also making payments of CVD through debit entries under their DEPB. 3. During the course of audit of Appellant's records, Department objected that no credit can be availed on duty payment made through debit in their DEPB, stating that such debit does not constitute as payment of duty. Thus, Cenvat credit could not have been availed by the Appellant for CVD paid by debit entries in DEPB. 4. In light of above, the SCN dated 20.09.2007 was issued to the Appellant, proposing aboveme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rip. 9. Further referring to the show cause notice learned Counsel points out that as per show cause notice - in the course of CERA audit by the AGMP, it was observed that appellant imported inputs and capital goods, and under DEPB scheme paid additional duty i.e. CVD through DEPB pass book and availed cenvat credit of the same amounting to Rs. 38,63,479/- during the period October, 2002 to March, 2005 and Rs. 3,46,873/- during the period March, 2005 to September, 2005. It is further alleged that the appellant did not divulge the fact of having availed cenvat credit of CVD, which was paid through DEPB, in the monthly return(s). Thus, it appears to Revenue that the appellant have intentionally suppressed the facts of the case. Thus, exten....