2022 (3) TMI 1275
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Sr. D.R. ORDER PER BENCH:- This bunch of appeals is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A),against upholding levy of fee u/s 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter short the 'Act'). 2. Since, there is a common issue being involved in all these appeals, hence they are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience and brevity. We have heard the Ld. Co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....provision in the Act u/s 200A for raising demand in respect of levy of fee u/s 234E. As such, as per the assessee, in respect of TDS statement filed for a period up to 31.03.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. The details of the TDS deduction and statement filed by the assessee are on record and the same had not been disputed by the revenue is reproduced....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....4. We do not find the view taken by the ld. CIT(A) to be correct in law. As against 'Rajesh Kaurani' (supra), 'Shri Fatehraj Singhvi and Others vs.UOI', 73 Taxmann.com 252 (Ker), as also admitted by the ld. CIT(A) himself, decides the issue in favour of the assessee. The only objection of the ld. CIT(A) is that this decision and others to the same effect have been taken into consideration by the H....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mpliedly demonstrated, any provision of statute is to be read as having prospective effect and not retrospective effect. Under the circumstances, we find that substitution made by clause (c) to (f) of sub-section (1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for ....


TaxTMI