TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Scrutiny of returns for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sued by the Board in order to ensure uniformity in selection/ identification of returns for scrutiny, methodology of scrutiny of such returns and other related procedures. 2. Relevant statutory provisions 2.1 Section 61 of the CGST Act, read with rule 99 of the CGST Rules, provides for scrutiny of returns. The same are reproduced below for reference: Section 61. Scrutiny of returns: "(1) The proper officer may scrutinize the return and related particulars furnished by the registered person to verify the correctness of the return and inform him of the discrepancies noticed, if any, in such manner as may be prescribed and seek his explanation thereto. (2) In case the explanation is found acceptable, the registered person shall be informed accordingly and no further action shall be taken in this regard. (3) In case no satisfactory explanation is furnished within a period of thirty days of being informed by the proper officer or such further period as may be permitted by him or where the registered person, after accepting the discrepancies, fails to take the corrective measure in his return for the month in which the discrepancy is accepted, the proper officer may initiate a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....table, conclude the proceedings after informing the registered person. (e) Where no satisfactory explanation is furnished by the registered person or where the registered person, after accepting the discrepancy, fails to pay the tax, interest and any other amount arising from such discrepancy, initiate appropriate action including those under section 65 or section 66 or section 67, or determination of tax and other dues under section 73 or section 74 of the CGST Act. 3. Selection of returns for scrutiny 3.1 Selection of returns for scrutiny is to be based on specific risk parameters. For this purpose, the Directorate General of Analytics and Risk Management (DGARM) has been assigned the task to select the GSTINs registered with Central tax authorities, whose returns are to be scrutinized, and to communicate the same to the field formations from time to time through the DDM portal (to the nodal officer of the Commissionerate concerned) for further action. 3.2 For convenience of field officers, DGARM would also provide some relevant data (along with likely revenue implication) pertaining to the returns to be scrutinized through the DDM portal. It may be noted that the data provid....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ist is only indicative, and not exhaustive. The proper officer may also consider any other parameter, as he may deem fit, for the purpose of scrutiny. 6.3 It may be noted that at this stage, the proper officer is expected to rely upon the information available with him or with the department. As far as possible, scrutiny of returns should have minimal interface between the proper officer and the registered person and, there should normally not be any need for seeking documents/ records from the taxpayers before issuance of FORM GST ASMT-10. 6.4 The proper officer shall issue a notice to the registered person in FORM GST ASMT-10 informing him of the discrepancies noticed and seeking his explanation thereto. While issuing such notice, the Proper Officer may, as far as possible, quantify the amount of tax, interest and any other amount payable in relation to such discrepancies. It may also be ensured that the discrepancies so communicated may, as far as possible, be specific in nature and not vague or general. There may be cases where the registered person may already have made additional payment of tax, cess, etc., after filing of the returns for the relevant tax period, through FO....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... safeguard revenue may be taken up expeditiously. In this regard, the following timelines may be observed by all concerned: S. no. Process/Event Timeline/ Frequency (i) Communication of list of GSTINs selected for scrutiny (by DGARM to the nodal officer of the Commissionerate concerned) From time to time. (ii) Distribution of the list of GSTINs selected for scrutiny by the nodal officer to the proper officers concerned. Within three working days of receipt of the list from DGARM. (iii) Finalization of scrutiny schedule with the approval of the concerned Assistant/Deputy Commissioner Within seven working days of receipt of the details of the concerned GSTINs from the nodal officer. (iv) Sharing the scrutiny schedule by the zone with DGGST Within thirty days of receipt of the details of the concerned GSTINs from DGARM. (v) Issuance of notice by the proper officer for intimating discrepancies in FORM GST ASMT-10, where required Within the month, as mentioned in scrutiny schedule for scrutiny of the returns of the said GSTIN. (vi) Reply by the registered person in FORM GST ASMT-11 Within a period of thirty days of being informed by the proper officer in FORM GST AS....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....GST, in turn, would present the progress report to the Board, through the GST Policy Wing, by the 20th day of the corresponding month. 9. Till the time scrutiny module is made available on the CBIC-GST application/AIO for CBIC officers, the aforesaid interim procedure for scrutiny of returns may be conducted on manual basis. Any communication with the taxpayer for the purpose of scrutiny shall be made with the use of DIN as per the guidelines mentioned in the Circular No. 122/41/2019-GST dated 5th November 2019. 10. This SOP is envisaged to enable the department to leverage technology and risk-based tools to encourage self-compliance and to conduct scrutiny of returns with minimal interaction with the registered persons. All Principal Chief Commissioners (PCCs)/ Chief Commissioners (CCs) are requested to closely monitor timely scrutiny of returns of the identified GSTINs within their jurisdictions. 11. Difficulties, if any, in implementation of these instructions may be informed to the Board (gstcbec@ gov.in). (Sanjay Mangal) Principal Commissioner (GST) Annexure A SCRUTINY SCHEDULE (Refer Para 5.1) ZCDR Code Financial Year GSTIN Month in which ASMT-10 is proposed to be....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-2A, as only registered persons furnish FORM GSTR-1. Moreover, details of ITC on account of import of services also are not communicated in FORM GSTR-2A. As such, the reverse charge supplies declared in table 3.1(d) of FORM GSTR-3B cannot be less than the inward supplies attracting reverse charge as available in the above mentioned tables of FORM GSTR-2A. Where the RCM supplies declared in table 3.1(d) of FORM GSTR-3B are less than the inward supplies attracting reverse charge as per details available in FORM GSTR-2A, it may indicate short payment of tax liability on account of RCM supplies. It may be noted that the said tables in FORM GSTR-2A contain details of supplies attracting forward as well as reverse charge. Therefore, only the supplies against which there is "Yes" or "Y" in column 14 of Table 3, column 16 of Table 4, column 15 of Table 5 and column 18 of Table 6 may be considered. (iii) Tax/Cess paid in cash as per column 8 of Table 6.1 of FORM GSTR-3B. In respect of inward supplies liable to reverse charge, tax/cess is to be paid in cash. Besides such RCM payments in cash, there may also be other payments in cash by the registered person. In any case, tax liability of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees (in relation to supply, or for reasons other than supply, or due to inward supply from unregistered person). Besides such supplies, the registered person may also have such other supplies which do not require generation of e-way bills, such as supply of services or supplies as specified in sub-rule (14) of rule 138, etc. Therefore, e-way bills capture a part of supplies made by the registered person. However, in table 3.1 of FORM GSTR-3B, the registered person is required to declare details of all outward supplies. Accordingly, liability declared in table 3.1 (a) and (b) of FORM GSTR-3B should not be less than tax liability as declared in the e-way bills. 7. Claim of ITC in respect of supplies from taxpayers whose registrations have been cancelled retrospectively. In case of retrospective cancellation of registration of a supplier, the recipient is not entitled to claim ITC in respect of invoices or debit notes issued after the effective date of cancellation of the registration. Effective date of cancellation of registrations of the suppliers, if any, is made available in relevant tables of FORM GSTR-2A. Acco....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... input tax credit in respect of inputs or input services and reversal thereof. Rule 43 provides for manner of determination of input tax credit in respect of capital goods and reversal thereof in certain cases. The registered person avails ITC in table 4(A) of FORM GSTR-3B and reverses in Table 4(B). It may be verified whether requisite reversals have actually been made by the said registered person. 12. Whether the registered person has paid interest liability in terms of section 50. As per section 50 of the CGST Act a registered person is required to pay interest on delayed payment of tax. It may be verified whether interest payable as per the provisions of section 50 of the CGST Act has actually been paid by the registered person. 13. Whether the registered person has paid late fee in terms of section 47 in respect of returns/statements. As per section 47 of the CGST Act a registered person is required to pay late fee for delayed filing of returns / statements under the Act. It may be verified whether late fee payable as per the provisions of section 47 of the CGST Act has actually been paid by the registered person. Annexure C SCRUTINY REGISTER TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE PRO....